3-Sets Inventory — Workshop variant (3SI-24)

3sets.org — CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

3sets

3-Sets Inventory — Workshop variant (3SI-24)

Longer self-diagnosis with 24 items measuring Tool-Set, Skill-Set, and Mind-Set strength. Separate from the online Quick-Check (3SI-15) at 3sets.org/en/diagnosis; the item lists are not identical.
Version 1.0 · 2026-04-07


Instructions

Rate each statement from 1 to 5 based on the last 30 days.

Rating Meaning
1 Never / Not at all
2 Rarely / Slightly
3 Sometimes / Moderately
4 Often / Mostly
5 Always / Completely

Time required: 5-7 minutes


Part A: Tool-Set

Tools = external artifacts that structure, enable, or constrain your work (software, hardware, methods, processes, physical environment).

# Statement Score (1-5)
T1 I have access to the tools I need to do my work effectively.
T2 The tools I use are appropriate for the tasks I perform.
T3 My tools work reliably without frequent breakdowns or workarounds.
T4 I use my tools' core features, not just basic functions.
T5 I could explain why I chose my current tools over alternatives.
T6 I regularly evaluate whether my tools still serve my needs.
T7 My tools integrate well with each other (data flows, no re-entry).
T8 I spend more time using tools than maintaining or troubleshooting them.

Tool-Set Total: / 40


Part B: Skill-Set

Skills = capabilities you possess that can be demonstrated through action and developed through practice.

# Statement Score (1-5)
S1 I can perform the core tasks of my role without constant guidance.
S2 I know which of my skills are strong and which need development.
S3 I can adapt my approach when my usual methods don't work.
S4 I actively practice or study to improve my capabilities.
S5 I can teach others how to do what I do.
S6 I recognize when a problem exceeds my current skill level.
S7 I have strategies for learning new skills efficiently.
S8 My skills match what my current role actually requires.

Skill-Set Total: / 40


Part C: Mind-Set

Mindset = beliefs, assumptions, and mental models that shape how you perceive and interpret situations.

# Statement Score (1-5)
M1 I believe my abilities can improve with effort and practice.
M2 I see setbacks as information, not as evidence of my limitations.
M3 I'm willing to try approaches that might not work.
M4 I can articulate why my work matters beyond immediate outputs.
M5 I notice when my assumptions might be wrong.
M6 I can hold uncertainty without rushing to premature conclusions.
M7 I change my views when presented with good evidence.
M8 I believe the system I work in can improve, not just individuals.

Mind-Set Total: / 40


Scoring

Step 1: Calculate Raw Scores

Dimension Raw Score
Tool-Set (T) / 40
Skill-Set (S) / 40
Mind-Set (M) / 40

Step 2: Convert to Percentages

Formula: (Raw Score - 8) ÷ 32 × 100 = Percentage

Dimension Calculation Percentage
Tool-Set ( - 8) ÷ 32 × 100 = %
Skill-Set ( - 8) ÷ 32 × 100 = %
Mind-Set ( - 8) ÷ 32 × 100 = %

Step 3: Identify Your Profile

Interpretation Bands:

Percentage Band Meaning
0-25% Critical This set is actively blocking your effectiveness
26-50% Weak This set is limiting your potential
51-75% Adequate This set is functional but not a strength
76-100% Strong This set is a source of advantage

Your Weakest Set: (lowest percentage)

Alignment Gap: Highest % minus Lowest % = %


Profile Types

Based on your scores, identify your profile:

Profile Pattern If This Is You
Tool Fetishist T >> S and M You have great tools but lack skills to use them or belief in their value. Intervention: Stop buying tools. Start practicing.
Competent Cynic S >> T and M You're skilled but under-equipped and burned out. Intervention: Upgrade tools. Address beliefs about whether things can improve.
Motivated Amateur M >> T and S You believe in the mission but lack tools and skills. Intervention: Get proper equipment. Invest in training.
Well-Equipped Doubter T and S >> M You have tools and skills but are paralyzed by mindset. Intervention: Address limiting beliefs. Start small experiments.
Skilled Luddite S >> T; M average You're competent but refuse to adopt useful tools. Intervention: Examine resistance. Pilot one new tool.
Visionary Without Hands M >> S; T average You have grand ideas but can't execute. Intervention: Close skill gaps. Find collaborators with complementary skills.
Balanced T ≈ S ≈ M (all adequate+) Your sets are aligned. Focus: Raise all three together, maintain balance.

Your Profile:


Action Planning

Primary Intervention Target

Your weakest set is:

If Tool-Set is weakest:

If Skill-Set is weakest:

If Mind-Set is weakest:

Alignment Fix

If your gap is >30%, the sets are fighting each other.

Common misalignments and fixes:

Misalignment Symptom Fix
T high, M low "I have tools but don't believe they'll help" Use tools for low-stakes task. Build evidence.
S high, T low "I'm skilled but don't have what I need" Advocate for resources. Temporary workarounds.
M high, S low "I believe but can't do" Structured learning plan. Mentor/coach.
T high, S low "I have tools but can't use them" Training. Practice. Permission to be bad at first.

Re-Assessment

Take this inventory again in 90 days to track change.

Date T% S% M% Gap Notes
Baseline

Quick Reference


For Teams

To use this inventory with a team:

  1. Each member completes individually
  2. Calculate team averages for T, S, M
  3. Identify team's weakest dimension
  4. Discuss: Where do we agree? Where do we diverge?
  5. Plan team-level intervention for weakest set

Team Scoring Sheet:

Member T% S% M% Weakest
Team Avg

3-Sets Inventory — Workshop variant (3SI-24) v1.0 Part of the 3-Sets Method by Chris N. License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0